Home

A six-part documentary claimed to have historically-accurate drama, presents Alexander the Great ahistorically misusing the assumptions and psychology of our time to “present” his. Even the academic interviewees seemed either not to notice, or not to be embarrassed.

The emperor had no clothes, however willfully blind his followers were and are… but the worst is perhaps that he is so embarrassing.

However understandable and necessary words of, thoughts about, and prayers to “God” are, those which have not gone through the “death of God”, a kind of Nietzschean bath, are out of the time of höHistory.

Dostoyevsky’s “Grand Inquisitor” would sympathize, as more realistically would pastors and ministers… But those theologies, which are not “postmortem dei” are naïve in a mature time.

While there are certainly a great differences between the glories and the trivials of this world… what in deeper facts are any lasting differences?

Physiognomy teveals mentality.

Is the degree of insight, independence of person, and intelligence level of tens of millions of Americans.

Ignore thyself.

Deceive thyself.

For the deeper elements of men and women, it is arguably less geography than the psychography, the sociography in which one lives that is the most influential.

are condemned to psychologizing.