Home

Some of these “Notes” can only be “true” in so far as autobiography is in itself true, and not as might be imagined with an erred assumption of independent objectivity of some social politics, et al.

Very few are in reality not group personalities.

But most being most, they don’t notice.

So many prominent political personalities, who are in themselves unworthy of attention.

To actually better understand one’s time by studying history, one must first really be willing and wanting to understand one’s time.

Rarely to my sight do many want to live so. In fact, few seem to realize such as possible.

From some 23 years ago. Moscow.

http://www.americanreflections.net/essays/man_the_troubled_creature_en.html

Most seem asleep, some adream, few awake.

And then there are those many I know who never subsequently realized to what degree they didn’t learn in college.

carpe aeternitates

To privately bear an unshared Meaning in daily life.

“the moral equivalent to war” (W. James)

the amoral equivalent to war?

the immoral equivalent to war?

the non-moral equivalent to war?

Externalized Manichaeanism, the outer jihad, a Führer