More psychology than history

While most humans, men and women, find and/or create a sense of life and its (and their) meaning from the ideas and events of history passed, “History” itself seems secondarily, if not tertiarily, a means to understanding human being themselves. It is more true and realistic – also, perhaps especially, considering how unconscious and purely plain ignorant and unaware most are, and live, of even their own people’s history – to approach the human being, individually and collectively, in relation to state of mind, a state of human being. In other words, more (social) psychology than history; and with that more state of being than state of mind. Perhaps best: mind in and of being.